Friday, December 26, 2014

Abcs Of Scientific Evidence Of God

By Stacey Burt


The word Jehovah is used to indicate a higher entity with extraordinary power and meant variously called in different religious cultures. The study regarding its different representations and their historical proceed is the subject regarding science regarding religion then, for example, the history and phenomenology regarding religion (scientific evidence of God).

The existence, nature and experience regarding Jehovah is the object regarding reflection theologies and some fields regarding philosophy as metaphysics, but is also found in other cultural fields, such as literature or art, not necessarily related to practice religious.

In Book X regarding Laws attempts to articulate a proregarding of Jehovah starting from movement from the soul, and defends precisely the idea regarding a divine than the human world. Aristotle come to demonstrate the philosophical necessity about Jehovah as unmoved mover, first cause uncaused. He subdivided the sciences into three branches. According to Aristotle, only the divine is true being "fixed and unchanging"; to be true, as in Parmenides and Plato, is what is "necessary", perfect, so stable, not subject to change regarding any kind. Becoming instead is a lower form regarding reality that you can also study, but does not lead to any universal knowledge.

The complexity regarding definition, as well as the tension regarding religious experience into something "wholly other" remote "elsewhere" than what is ordinarily perceived, is effectively described by scholar regarding religions Dutch Gerardus van der Leeuw"When we say that Jehovah is the object regarding religious experience lived, we must remember that Jehovah is a notion regarding ten not very precise; many times this notion is not identical with that which usually mean by Jehovah. The religious experience lived refers to something: in many cases it is impossible to say more than that, and so that man can to give this thing a few any predicate, must be forced to represent it as something different. The subject regarding religion then you can say this first, that is something different, surprising.

With the case regarding finding the wonder at the beginning not only regarding philosophy, but also regarding religion. So far no mention at all supernatural or transcendent, indeed one can speak regarding Jehovah only in an improper way; we only have a lived experience, connected to different amazing. Far from the slightest prospect theory and not even the most elementary generalization, we content ourselves with the empirical observation: this object out regarding ordinary.

And this is the power that the object emits. "Finally, the relationship regarding men with this power is characterized by astonishment, fear, fright, in extreme cases. This is because the power is not considered supernatural but extraordinary, different. The objects and people invested with power have a specific nature, what we call sacred. Still within phenomenological-religious it was considered to identify the constants in meanings and representations attributed to "Jehovah" as Supreme Being in different cultures.

"That which does not admit any doubt is the near-universality regarding belief in a divine being heavenly, creator regarding universe and the guarantor regarding fertility regarding land (thanks to rains pouring). These Beings have foreknowledge and infinite wisdom, have established moral laws, regarding ten rituals regarding clan, during their short stay on earth; oversee compliance with the laws, and blows with lightning those who violate them.

The Greeks put the problem regarding existence regarding Jehovah. Many philosophers occupied themselves, more or less indirectly, regarding matter. In pre-Socratic eg naturalistic philosophy, which dominated over the other, regarding ten led to search regarding a first principle or arch, both philosophers regarding Miletus in Heraclitus, or to be like in eleati (Parmenides regarding all). Anaxagoras believed the universe moved by a supreme intelligence (Nous), while Democritus did not seem to contemplate the idea regarding a divine plan in cosmos.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment